Successful coil embolization of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm of the superior gluteal artery after a percutaneous awake robot-assisted sacroiliac joint fusion: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion has gained popularity, but it carries the risk of complications such as injury to the superior gluteal artery (SGA). The authors present the case of an awake percutaneous robot-assisted SIJ fusion leading to an SGA pseudoaneurysm. OBSERVATIONS: An 80-year-old male, who had undergone an awake percutaneous robot-assisted SIJ fusion, experienced postoperative left hip pain and bruising. Subsequent arteriography demonstrated an SGA branch pseudoaneurysm requiring coil embolization. LESSONS: An SGA injury, although uncommon (1.2% incidence), can arise from percutaneous screw placement, aberrant anatomy, or hardware contact. Thorough preoperative imaging, precise robot-assisted screw insertion, and soft tissue protection are crucial to mitigate risks. Immediate angiography aids in prompt diagnosis and effective intervention. Comprehensive knowledge of anatomical variants is essential for managing complications and optimizing preventative measures in robot-assisted SIJ fusion.

Intramedullary nailing vs. open reduction-internal fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare outcomes following intramedullary nailing (IMN) vs. open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. RCTs comparing IMN and ORIF for humeral shaft fractures were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using RevMan. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 512 patients were included. Overall, 8.4% of patients treated with IMN and 6.4% of patients treated with ORIF had nonunion (P = .57, I2 = 0%), with a significantly faster time to union with IMN (10 weeks vs. 11.9 weeks, P < .05). There was no significant difference in the rate of reoperation (11.6% in IMN group vs. 7.6% in ORIF group, P = .26) or radial nerve palsy (2.8% in IMN group vs. 4.2% in ORIF group, P = .58). A lower rate of infection was noted with IMN (1.2% vs. 5.3%, P < .05). Additionally, there was a lower operative time with IMN (61 minutes vs. 88 minutes, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Level I evidence in the literature does not show a significant difference in rates of union, reoperation, or radial nerve palsy between IMN and ORIF for humeral shaft fractures. Overall, treatment with IMN results in a lower infection rate, less operative time, and a modestly quicker time to union. The optimal treatment strategy for humeral shaft fractures may be best informed by fracture pattern and surgeon preference.

Interfragmentary strain measurement post-fixation to guide intraoperative decision making: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Interfragmentary strain influences whether a fracture will undergo direct and indirect fracture healing. Orthopedic trauma surgeons modulate strain and create optimal biomechanical environments for specific fracture patterns using fixation constructs. However, objective intraoperative interfragmentary strain measurement does not currently inform fixation strategy in common practice. This review identifies potential methods and technologies to enable intraoperative strain measurement for guiding optimal fracture fixation strategies. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were methodologically queried for manuscripts containing terms related to "bone fracture," "strain," "measurement," and "intraoperative." Manuscripts were systematically screened for relevance and adjudicated by three reviewers. Relevant articles describing methods to measure interfragmentary strain intraoperatively were summarized. RESULTS: After removing duplicates, 1404 records were screened initially. There were 49 manuscripts meeting criteria for in-depth review. Of these, four reports were included in this study that described methods applicable to measuring interfragmentary strain intraoperatively. Two of these reports described a method using instrumented staples, one described optical tracking of Kirschner wires, and one described using a digital linear variable displacement transducer with a custom external fixator. CONCLUSION: The four reports identified by this review describe potential methods to quantify interfragmentary strain after fixation. However, further studies are needed to confirm the precision and accuracy of these measurements across a range of fractures and fixation methods. Additionally, described methods require the insertion and likely removal of additional implants into the bone. Ideally, innovations that measure interfragmentary strain intraoperatively would provide dynamic biomechanical feedback for the surgeon to proactively modulate construct stability.

Updated Blocking Techniques for Lower Extremity Medullary Nailing: Beyond the Concavity of Deformity.

Modern blocking techniques are useful to achieve anatomic alignment and stable fixation during end-segment nailing. Whether with screws or drill bits, blocking implants can correct both angular and translational deformities. Understanding the biomechanics of blocking implants allows the surgeon to properly plan their placement based on principles rather than dogma. We use case examples to highlight updates in blocking techniques during acute surgical fixation and chronic deformity correction.

Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Traumatic Sacral Fractures: Case Series Investigating Early Safety and Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: High-energy traumatic sacral fractures, particularly U-type or AOSpine classification type C fractures, may lead to significant functional deficits. Traditionally, spinopelvic fixation for unstable sacral fractures was performed with open reduction and fixation, but robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgical methods now present new, less invasive approaches. The objective here was to present a series of patients with traumatic sacral fractures treated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation and discuss early experience, considerations, and technical challenges. METHODS: Between June 2022 and January 2023, 7 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Intraoperative fluoroscopic images were merged with intraoperative computed tomography images using a robotic system to plan the trajectories for placement of bilateral lumbar pedicle and iliac screws. Intraoperative computed tomography was performed after pedicle and pelvic screw insertion to confirm appropriate placement before insertion of rods percutaneously without the need for a side connector. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 7 patients (4 female, 3 male) with ages ranging from 20 to 74. Intraoperatively, the mean blood loss was 85.7 ± 84.0 mL, and mean operative time was 178.4 ± 63.9 minutes. There were no complications in 6 patients; 1 patient experienced both a medially breached pelvic screw and a complicated rod pullout. All patients were safely discharged to their homes or an acute rehabilitation facility. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience reveals that robotic-assisted minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation for traumatic sacral fractures is a safe and feasible treatment option with the potential to improve outcomes and reduce complications.

Peripheral Nerve Block Delays Mobility and Increases Length of Stay in Patients With Geriatric Hip Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) has been increasingly used in the care of patients with geriatric hip fracture to reduce perioperative opiate use and the need for general anesthesia. However, the associated motor palsy may impair patients' ability to mobilize effectively after surgery and subsequently may increase latency to key mobility milestones postoperatively, as well as increase inpatient length of stay (LOS). The aim of this study was to investigate time-to-mobility milestones and length of hospital stay between peripheral, epidural, and general anesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 1,351 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery for hip fracture between 2012 and 2018 at a single academic health system. Patients were excluded if baseline nonambulatory, restricted weight-bearing postoperatively, or sustained concomitant injuries precluding mobilization, with a final cohort of 1,013 patients. Time-to-event analyses for discharge and mobility milestones were assessed using univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: PNB was associated with delayed postoperative time to ambulation ( P < 0.001) and time to out-of-bed ( P = 0.029), along with increased LOS ( P < 0.001). Epidural anesthesia was associated with less delay to first out-of-bed ( P = 0.002), less delay to ambulation ( P = 0.001), and overall reduced length of stay ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: PNB was associated with slower mobilization and longer hospitalization while epidural anesthesia was associated with quicker mobilization and shorter hospital stays. Epidural anesthesia may be a preferable anesthesia choice in patients with geriatric hip fracture when possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Type III Open Tibia Fractures Treated With Single-Stage Immediate Medullary Nailing and Attempted Primary Closure Yield Low Rates of Flap Coverage.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether type III open high-energy tibia fractures treated with immediate intramedullary nailing (IMN) and primary closure yield low rates of flap coverage. METHODS: Patients with high-energy type IIIA open tibia (OTA/AO42/43) fractures treated with IMN over a 10-year period at a level 1 academic center with at least 90 days of in-person postoperative follow-up were included. Single-stage reamed IMN with acute primary skin closure using Allgower-Donati suture technique was utilized in patients without notable skin loss. The primary outcome was treatment failure of acute primary skin closure requiring subsequent soft-tissue coverage procedures. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients with type IIIA tibia fractures met inclusion criteria. Of 107 of the 111 patients (96%) with skin closure at the index surgery, 95 of the 107 patients (89%) healed their soft-tissue envelop uneventfully. Among the patients who failed primary closure (11%), five required free tissue transfers, five required local rotational flaps, and two underwent split thickness skin grafting only. Patients who failed acute primary closure declared within an average of 8 weeks postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Treatment of type IIIA open high-energy tibia fractures with immediate IMN and primary closure using meticulous soft-tissue handling yields low rates of flap coverage.

Use of a Six-Item Modified Frailty Index to Predict 30-day Adverse Events, Readmission, and Mortality in Older Patients Undergoing Surgical Fixation of Lower Extremity, Pelvic, and Acetabular Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: This is a retrospective study evaluating the use of a new six-item modified frailty index (MF-6) to predict short-term outcomes of patients receiving surgery for lower extremity fractures. METHODS: Patients older than 65 years undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for lower extremity, pelvic, and acetabulum fractures were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The MF-6 was calculated by assigning one point for each of six common conditions. Multivariable analysis was used to compare patients with an MF-6 of <3 and ≥3. Outcome measures included complications, mortality, readmission, revision surgery, and length of stay. An area under the curve receiver operator analysis was conducted to compare the MF-6 with MF-5, an existing five-item frailty index. RESULTS: Nine thousand four hundred sixty-three patients were included. Patients with an MF-6 of ≥3 were at markedly higher risk of discharge destination other than home (Exp[B] = 2.09), mortality (Exp[B] = 2.48), major adverse events (Exp[B] = 2.16), and readmission (Exp[B] = 1.82). Receiver-operating curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.65 for mortality, 0.62 for major adverse events, and 0.62 for discharge destination other than home, all of which outperformed the MF-5. DISCUSSION: The MF-6 was correlated with a 30-day postoperative incidence of infectious complications, readmission, and discharge destination. MF-6 scores can be used to risk-stratify patient populations as shifts to value-based care continue to develop.

Drilling the cement mantle in well-fixed periprosthetic femur fractures is not associated with arthroplasty-related complications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if screw fixation across a cement mantle is safe and effective during plate fixation of well-fixed periprosthetic femur fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with AO/OTA 32A[B1] or 32A[C] periprosthetic femur fractures treated with open reduction and internal plate and screw fixation after cemented or uncemented hip arthroplasty. INTERVENTION: Screw placement into the cement mantle during internal fixation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes included radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening, infection, nonunion, implant failure, and overall reoperation rate. RESULTS: There were 28 patients who met inclusion criteria. A total of 9 patients had screws placed in the cement mantle while the remaining 19 patients had screws placed around an uncemented stem. At a mean of 3.7-year follow-up, there were no cases of revision arthroplasty or aseptic loosening in either group. There were no significant differences in rates of infection, nonunion, implant failure, or reoperation rate between patients who had screw placement into a cement mantle vs around an uncemented stem. CONCLUSION: Drilling into the cement mantle during fixation of a periprosthetic femur fracture around a well-fixed cemented hip stem appears safe and effective. When possible, surgeons can consider bicortical screws around a cemented stem, given the biomechanical advantages over unicortical screw or cerclage fixation. Larger prospective trials confirming the safety of this technique are warranted prior to routine implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A Single Proximal Interlocking Bolt May Be Sufficient for Retrograde Nailing of Extra-articular Femur Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a single proximal interlocking bolt was sufficient during the treatment of extra-articular femur fractures with retrograde medullary nailing. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Academic Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: The study included 136 patients with extra-articular femur fractures treated with retrograde medullary nailing who met inclusion and follow-up criteria. INTERVENTION: The intervention included surgical treatment for a femur fracture with retrograde medullary nailing, with comparisons made between those treated with a single proximal interlocking (1 IL) bolt and those treated with 2 proximal interlocking bolts (2 IL). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The main outcome measurements were as follows: (1) rate of nonunion and (2) rate of catastrophic implant failure. RESULTS: There was no difference in the rate of nonunion requiring surgical intervention between the 2 groups. There were no catastrophic failures in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A single proximal interlocking bolt may be sufficient when using retrograde nailing for the treatment of extra-articular femur fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is the timing of fixation associated with fracture-related infection among tibial plateau fracture patients with compartment syndrome? A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 729 patients.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures with an ipsilateral compartment syndrome are a clinical challenge with limited guidance regarding the best time to perform open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) relative to fasciotomy wound closure. This study aimed to determine if the risk of fracture-related infection (FRI) differs based on the timing of tibial plateau ORIF relative to closure of ipsilateral fasciotomy wounds. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified patients with tibial plateau fractures and an ipsilateral compartment syndrome treated with 4-compartment fasciotomy at 22 US trauma centers from 2009 to 2019. The primary outcome measure was FRI requiring operative debridement after ORIF. The ORIF timing relative to fasciotomy closure was categorized as ORIF before, at the same time as, or after fasciotomy closure. Bayesian hierarchical regression models with a neutral prior were used to determine the association between timing of ORIF and infection. The posterior probability of treatment benefit for ORIF was also determined for the three timings of ORIF relative to fasciotomy closure. RESULTS: Of the 729 patients who underwent ORIF of their tibial plateau fracture, 143 (19.6%) subsequently developed a FRI requiring operative treatment. Patients sustaining infections were: 21.0% of those with ORIF before (43 of 205), 15.9% at the same time as (37 of 232), and 21.6% after fasciotomy wound closure (63 of 292). ORIF at the same time as fasciotomy closure demonstrated a 91% probability of being superior to before closure (RR, 0.75; 95% CrI, 0.38 to 1.10). ORIF after fasciotomy closure had a lower likelihood (45%) of a superior outcome than before closure (RR, 1.02; 95% CrI; 0.64 to 1.39). CONCLUSION: Data from this multicenter cohort confirms previous reports of a high FRI risk in patients with a tibial plateau fracture and ipsilateral compartment syndrome. Our results suggest that ORIF at the time of fasciotomy closure has the highest probability of treatment benefit, but that infection was common with all three timings of ORIF in this difficult clinical situation.

Mini-fragment plating of olecranon fractures is comparable to precontoured small-fragment plating.

INTRODUCTION: Though long-term functional outcomes of olecranon fracture plate fixation are favorable, postoperative implant irritation commonly leads to elective removal. We hypothesized that mini-fragment plates will decrease implant removal compared to precontoured plates. METHODS: Patients with isolated olecranon fracture (AO/OTA 2U1-B1) treated with plate fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a (1) surgeon contoured mini-fragment or (2) precontoured olecranon-specific plate. Rates of symptomatic implants and implant removal were compared. RESULTS: 98 and 32 patients were treated with precontoured and mini-fragment plates, respectively. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar. Mean follow-up was 20.6 months. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complication (22/98, 22.4% vs. 5/32, 15.6%; p = 0.41) or reoperation (37/98, 37.8% vs. 8/32, 25%; p = 0.19). Symptomatic implants were common in the precontoured cohort (44/98, 44.9% vs. 7/32, 21.9%; p < 0.05). Implant removal rates were 36.7% and 18.8%, respectively (p = 0.06). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Olecranon fracture stabilization with mini-fragment plate is associated with lower rates of symptomatic implants, with no difference in postoperative complications or reoperations. Mini-fragment plating is a safe and promising alternative to precontoured plating.

A bioactive synthetic membrane improves bone healing in a preclinical nonunion model.

OBJECTIVES: High energy long bone fractures with critical bone loss are at risk for nonunion without strategic intervention. We hypothesize that a synthetic membrane implanted at a single stage improves bone healing in a preclinical nonunion model. METHODS: Using standard laboratory techniques, microspheres encapsulating bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP2) or platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) were designed and coupled to a type 1 collagen sheet. Critical femoral defects were created in rats and stabilized by locked retrograde intramedullary nailing. The negative control group had an empty defect. The induced membrane group (positive control) had a polymethylmethacrylate spacer inserted into the defect for four weeks and replaced with a bare polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate (PCL/ß-TCP) scaffold at a second stage. For the experimental groups, a bioactive synthetic membrane embedded with BMP2, PDGF or both enveloped a PCL/ß-TCP scaffold was implanted in a single stage. Serial radiographs were taken at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively from the definitive procedure and evaluated by two blinded observers using a previously described scoring system to judge union as primary outcome. RESULTS: All experimental groups demonstrated better union than the negative control (p = 0.01). The groups with BMP2 incorporated into the membrane demonstrated higher average union scores than the other groups (p = 0.01). The induced membrane group performed similarly to the PDGF group. Complete union was only demonstrated in groups with BMP2-eluting membranes. CONCLUSIONS: A synthetic membrane comprised of type 1 collagen embedded with controlled release BMP2 improved union of critical bone defects in a preclinical nonunion model.

ICD-10 codes do not accurately reflect ankle fracture injury patterns.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of International Classification of Disease Version 10 (ICD-10) coding for ankle fracture injury patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study PATIENTS: 97 adult patients with fractures about the ankle (rotational ankle fracture or distal tibia fracture) from 2016 to 2020, selected by stratified random sampling. INTERVENTION: Assignment of an ICD-10 code representative of a rotational ankle fracture, pilon fracture, or unspecified fracture of the lower leg. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Injury radiographs were reviewed by three authors to determine the correct code. Agreement between the correct code and the electronic medical record (EMR) assigned code was determined using kappa's statistic in the aggregate as well as percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) between individual codes. RESULTS: 59 of 97 cases (60.8%) demonstrated discordance between the existing EMR and surgeon-assigned codes. Aggregate agreement between all codes was fair (K = 0.26). Lateral malleolus fracture codes demonstrated the highest PPV (0.91, 95% CI 0.72-0.99), while the lowest PPV was found for "other fractures of the lower leg" (0.05, 95% CI 0.0-0.24) and "other fracture of the fibula" (0.0, 95% CI 0.0-0.15). Generalized "other fracture" codes comprised 45% of EMR codes compared to only 6% of assigned codes (p < 0.001). EMR codes were specific but not sensitive. CONCLUSION: There is substantial discordance between existing EMR and surgeon-assigned ICD-10 codes for ankle fractures. Database research that relies on ICD-10 coding as a surrogate for primary clinical data should be interpreted with caution and institutions should make efforts to increase the accuracy of their coding.

Indications for cement augmentation in fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic review of evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Achieving durable mechanical stability in geriatric intertrochanteric proximal femur fractures remains a challenge. Concomitant poor bone quality, unstable fracture patterns, and suboptimal reduction are additional risk factors for early mechanical failure. Cement augmentation of the proximal locking screw or blade is one proposed method to augment implant anchorage. The purpose of this review is to describe the biomechanical and clinical evidence for cement augmentation of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures, and to elaborate indications for cement augmentation. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for English language studies up to January 2021. Studies that assessed effect of calcium phosphate or methylmethacrylate cement augmentation during open reduction and internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures were included. Studies with sample size < 5, nontraumatic or periprosthetic fractures, and nonunion or revision surgery were excluded. Study selection adhered to PRISMA criteria. RESULTS: 801 studies were identified, of which 40 met study criteria. 9 studies assessed effect of cement augmentation on fracture displacement. All but one found that cement decreased fracture displacement. 10 studies assessed effect of cement augmentation on total load or cycles to failure. All but one demonstrated that augmented implants increased this variable. Complication rates of cement augmentation during ORIF of intertrochanteric fractures ranged from 0 to 47%, while non-augmented implants ranged from 0 to 51%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0 to 11% in the cement-augmented group and 0 to 11% in the non-augmented group. Fixation failure ranged from 0 to 11% in the cement-augmented group and 0 to 20% in the non-augmented group. Nonunion ranged from 0 to 3.6% in the cement-augmented group and 0 to 34% in the non-augmented group. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium phosphate or PMMA-augmented CMN fixation of IT fractures increased construct stability and improved outcomes in biomechanical and early clinical studies. The findings of these studies suggest an important role for cement augmentation in patient populations at high risk of mechanical failure.

Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare complications and functional outcomes of treatment with primary distal femoral replacement (DFR) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for English language studies up to May 19, 2020, identifying 913 studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that assessed complications of periprosthetic distal femur fractures with primary DFR or ORIF were included. Studies with sample size ≤5, mean age <55, nontraumatic indications for DFR, ORIF with nonlocking plates, native distal femoral fractures, or revision surgeries were excluded. Selection adhered to the PRISMA criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Study quality was assessed using previously reported criteria. There were 40 Level IV studies, 17 Level III studies, and 1 Level II study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifty-eight studies with 1484 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Complications assessed {incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.78 [0.59-1.03]} and reoperation or revision [IRR (95% CI): 0.71 (0.49-1.04)] were similar between the DFR and ORIF cohorts. The mean knee range of motion was greater in the ORIF cohort (DFR: 90.47 vs. ORIF: 100.36, P < 0.05). The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) (DFR: 79.41 vs. ORIF: 82.07, P = 0.35) and return to preoperative ambulatory status were similar [IRR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.48-1.41)]. CONCLUSIONS: In comparing complications among patients treated for periprosthetic distal femur fracture with DFR or ORIF, there was no difference between the groups. There were also no differences in functional outcomes, although knee range of motion was greater in the ORIF group. This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for future prospective trials evaluating the outcomes of these divergent treatment strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Countersinking the Lag Screw or Blade During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Less Collapse and Implant Prominence Without Increased Cutout Rates.

INTRODUCTION: The lag screw or helical blade of a cephalomedullary nail facilitates controlled collapse of intertrochanteric proximal femur fractures. However, excessive collapse results in decreased hip offset and symptomatic lateral implants. Countersinking the screw or helical blade past the lateral cortex may minimize subsequent prominence, but some surgeons are concerned that this will prevent collapse and result in failure through cutout. We hypothesized that patients with countersunk lag screws or helical blades do not experience higher rates of screw or blade cutout and have less implant prominence after fracture healing. METHODS: A retrospective review of 175 consecutive patients treated with cephalomedullary nails for AO/OTA 31A1-3 proximal femur fractures and a minimum 3-month follow-up and 254 patients with a 6-week follow-up at a single US level I trauma center. Patients were stratified based on countersunk versus noncountersunk lag screw or helical blade in a cephalomedullary nail. The primary outcome was the cutout rate at minimum 3 months, and the secondary outcome was radiographic collapse at minimum 6 weeks. RESULTS: Cutout rates were no different in patients with countersunk and noncountersunk screws and blades, and countersinking was associated with less collapse and less implant prominence at 6 weeks. DISCUSSION: Surgeons can countersink the lag screw or blade when treating intertrochanteric proximal femur fractures with a cephalomedullary nail without increasing failure rates and with the potential benefits of less prominent lateral implants and decreased collapse.

Simultaneous Posterolateral and Posteromedial Approaches for Fractures of the Entire Posterior Tibial Plafond: A Safe Technique for Effective Reduction and Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term results of surgical treatment with dual posterolateral and posteromedial approaches for fractures of the entire posterior tibial plafond and secondarily to identify common fracture characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Single academic Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty-five patients with posterior pilon fractures followed until fracture union (minimum 3 months). INTERVENTION: Surgical treatment using simultaneous combined posterolateral and posteromedial exposures for fracture reduction and internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: (1) Surgical outcomes including rate of wound complications and accuracy of the articular reduction. (2) Fracture characteristics including the incidence of articular impaction, comminution interfering with reduction, syndesmosis injury, and the type of fibula fracture. RESULTS: The rate of wound problems was low (6%), and 94% of patients had an articular reduction with less than 1 mm of step or gap. There were high rates of articular comminution (83%) and posteromedial articular impaction (63%) and a 17% rate of syndesmosis injury requiring repair. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical fixation using simultaneous, combined posterolateral and posteromedial approaches for posterior pilon fractures had a low rate of wound complications and was an effective strategy for obtaining an accurate reduction. The rate of syndesmotic instability requiring fixation was lower than previous work reporting on fixation using a single approach. This may be a useful technique for surgeons who treat these injuries. Careful assessment of the preoperative imaging is required in patients with posterior pilon fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Use of an Intraoperative Limb Positioner for Adjustable Distraction in Acetabulum Fractures with Femoral Head Protrusion: A Case Report.

CASE: Anatomic reduction of acetabular fractures with femoral head protrusion requires lateralization of the medialized femoral head to facilitate reduction and definitive fixation. In this case of a 71-year-old man with an associated both column acetabular fracture with femoral head medialization after a fall from a 10 foot ladder, we present the successful use of a novel reduction technique involving a modified arthroscopic limb positioner to provide adjustable distraction and counteract the deforming force in this injury pattern. CONCLUSION: A limb positioner can provide appropriate on-table traction in pelvis and acetabular surgery to neutralize deforming forces and facilitate reduction and fixation.

Supplemental medial small fragment fixation adds stability to distal femur fixation: A biomechanical study.

INTRODUCTION: Bridge plating of distal femur fractures with lateral locking plates is susceptible to varus collapse, fixation failure, and nonunion. While medial and lateral dual plating has been described in clinical series, the biomechanical effects of dual plating of distal femur fractures have yet to be clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to compare dual plating to lateral locked bridge plating alone in a cadaveric distal femur gap osteotomy model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gap osteotomies were created in eight matched pairs of cadaveric female distal femurs (average age: 64 yrs (standard deviation ± 4.4 yrs); age range: 57-68 yrs;) to simulate comminuted extraarticular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33A). Eight femurs underwent fixation with lateral locked plates alone and were matched with eight femurs treated with dual plating: lateral locked plates with supplemental medial small fragment non-locking fixation. Mechanical testing was performed on an ElectroPuls E10000 materials testing system using a 10 kN/100 Nm biaxial load cell. Specimens were subject to 25,000 cycles of cyclic loading from 100-1000 N at 2 Hz. RESULTS: Two (2/8) specimens in the lateral only group failed catastrophically prior to completion of testing. All dual plated specimens survived the testing regimen. Dual plated specimens demonstrated significantly less coronal plane displacement (median 0.2 degrees, interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-0.5 degrees) compared to 2.0 degrees (IQR 1.9-3.3, p = 0.02) in the lateral plate only group. Dual plated specimens demonstrated greater bending stiffness compared to the lateral plated group (median 29.0 kN/degree, IQR 1.5-68.2 kN/degree vs median 0.50 kN/degree, IQR 0.23-2.28 kN/degree, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Contemporary fixation methods with a distal femur fractures are susceptible to mechanical failure and nonunion with lateral plates alone. Dual plate fixation in a cadaveric model of distal femur fractures underwent significantly less displacement under simulated weight bearing conditions and demonstrated greater stiffness than lateral plating alone. Given the significant clinical failure rates of lateral bridge plating in distal femur fractures, supplemental fixation should be considered, and dual plating of distal femurs augments mechanical stability in a clinically relevant magnitude.